迎臂效應

迎臂效應（英語：，簡稱YIMBY，意为“歡迎來我家後院”）是一種支持住房的運動，與鄰避症候群現象恰巧形成對比[1]。迎臂效應主要的立場是支持在住房成本上升到無法負擔水準的城市內增加住房供應[2]。迎臂效應經常尋求土地使用分區，以允許生產更密集的住房或將過時的建筑物（如商場）重新用於住房[3][4][5]。一些迎臂效應還支持清潔能源或替代交通等公益項目[6][7][8]。

參見

參考資料

Semuels, Alana. . The Atlantic. 2017-07-05 [2017-07-05]. （原始内容存档于2018-03-25）. Out of a desire for more-equitable housing policy, some city dwellers have started allying with developers instead of opposing them.
Einstein, Katherine Levine; Glick, David M.; Palmer, Maxwell. . Neighborhood Defenders: Participatory Politics and America's Housing Crisis. 2019: 146–147 [2020-06-19]. ISBN 9781108769495. S2CID 226774677. doi:10.1017/9781108769495.007. （原始内容存档于2021-03-30）（英语）.
Kendall, Marissa. . The Mercury News. 2019-06-25 [2021-06-08]. （原始内容存档于2022-10-01）.
Ramos, Dante. . The Boston Globe. 2018-01-14 [2021-02-08]. （原始内容存档于2022-12-18）.
Bliss, Laura. . CityLab (Bloomberg). 2019-07-02 [2022-02-08]. （原始内容存档于2020-06-14）.
Bateman, Chris. . Toronto Metro. 2015-09-09 [2016-09-15]. （原始内容存档于2016-03-02）.
Kuntz, Tom. . The New York Times. 2009-08-17 [2018-07-31]. （原始内容存档于2009-12-20）. There's a growing recognition that opposition to growth — in Berkeley and Oakland, for example — contributed to environmentally unfriendly suburban and exurban sprawl, and that "infill development" — dense urban housing near mass transit — is now the way to go.
McCormick, Erin. . The Guardian. 2017-10-02 [2018-08-23]. （原始内容存档于2017-11-07）. The cause of our current shortage is 100% political," wrote Trauss in 2015, in an internet post that helped her build an army of followers to speak at public hearings, send letters and drum up support for housing on the internet.

延伸閱讀

Dougherty, Conor. . New York: Penguin Press. 2020. ISBN 978-0-525-56021-0. OCLC 1119743965.
Einstein, Katherine; Glick, David M.; Palmer, Maxwell. . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2020. ISBN 978-1-108-47727-7. OCLC 1111638842.

外部連結

"The San Francisco activists who say please build in my backyard" （页面存档备份，存于） on PBS NewsHour

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.

[1] Semuels, Alana. . The Atlantic. 2017-07-05 [2017-07-05]. （原始内容存档于2018-03-25）. Out of a desire for more-equitable housing policy, some city dwellers have started allying with developers instead of opposing them.

[2] Einstein, Katherine Levine; Glick, David M.; Palmer, Maxwell. . Neighborhood Defenders: Participatory Politics and America's Housing Crisis. 2019: 146–147 [2020-06-19]. ISBN 9781108769495. S2CID 226774677. doi:10.1017/9781108769495.007. （原始内容存档于2021-03-30）（英语）.

[3] Kendall, Marissa. . The Mercury News. 2019-06-25 [2021-06-08]. （原始内容存档于2022-10-01）.

[4] Ramos, Dante. . The Boston Globe. 2018-01-14 [2021-02-08]. （原始内容存档于2022-12-18）.

[5] Bliss, Laura. . CityLab (Bloomberg). 2019-07-02 [2022-02-08]. （原始内容存档于2020-06-14）.

[6] Bateman, Chris. . Toronto Metro. 2015-09-09 [2016-09-15]. （原始内容存档于2016-03-02）.

[7] Kuntz, Tom. . The New York Times. 2009-08-17 [2018-07-31]. （原始内容存档于2009-12-20）. There's a growing recognition that opposition to growth — in Berkeley and Oakland, for example — contributed to environmentally unfriendly suburban and exurban sprawl, and that "infill development" — dense urban housing near mass transit — is now the way to go.

[8] McCormick, Erin. . The Guardian. 2017-10-02 [2018-08-23]. （原始内容存档于2017-11-07）. The cause of our current shortage is 100% political," wrote Trauss in 2015, in an internet post that helped her build an army of followers to speak at public hearings, send letters and drum up support for housing on the internet.