戴蒙德诉查克拉巴蒂案
戴蒙德诉查克拉巴蒂案（），447 U.S. 303 (1980)是美国联邦最高法院判决的一个案件，裁定转基因生物可被授予专利[1]。
| 戴蒙德诉查克拉巴蒂案 Diamond v. Chakrabarty | |
|---|---|
 | |
| 辩论：19803月17日 判决：19806月16日 | |
| 案件全名 | Sidney A. Diamond, Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks, v. Ananda M. Chakrabarty, et al. |
| 引註案號 | |
| 既往案件 | Application of Bergy, 596 F.2d 952 (C.C.P.A. 1979); cert. granted, 444 U.S. 924 (1979) |
| 法庭判决 | |
| Living, man-made micro-organism is patentable subject matter as a "manufacture" or "composition of matter" within the meaning of the Patent Act of 1952. The fact that the organism sought to be patented is alive is no bar to patentability. Decision of the Court of Customs & Patent Appeals affirmed. | |
| 法庭意见 | |
| 多数意见 | 伯格 联名：Stewart, Blackmun, Rehnquist, Stevens |
| 不同意见 | 布倫南 联名：White, Marshall, Powell |
| 适用法条 | |
| Patent Act of 1952, specifically 35 U.S.C. § 101 | |
参考资料
- Diamond v. Chakrabarty, 447 U.S. 303 (1980).
本条目结合了美国政府文件中的公共领域资料。
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.